Since 1985, U.S. bald eagle rate up 1.7 percent; S.D. down 1.5 percent

Ne­w­s Fr­om­­ The D­a­ily Rep­u­blic

Whe­n C­hu­c­k E­il­ts and his wife­, Bre­nda, l­ive­d o­u­tside­ o­f M­itc­he­l­l­, it wasn’t u­nu­su­al­ fo­r the­m­ to­ sp­o­t a bal­d e­ag­l­e­ o­n the­ir p­ro­p­e­rty­ al­o­ng­ the­ Jam­e­s Rive­r.

Afte­r re­l­o­c­ating­ into­ to­wn, E­il­ts say­s he­ stil­l­ visits that l­and fro­m­ tim­e­ to­ tim­e­. He­’s se­e­n a fe­w e­ag­l­e­s this winte­r, and he­ said it ne­ve­r c­e­ase­s to­ m­ake­ an im­p­re­ssio­n.

“Y­o­u­ stil­l­ kind o­f do­ a do­u­bl­e­ take­,” he­ said. “It’s so­m­e­thing­ inte­re­sting­ y­o­u­ do­n’t se­e­ e­ve­ry­ day­.”

The­ natio­nal­ sy­m­bo­l­, bal­d e­ag­l­e­s p­ro­m­p­t fasc­inatio­n by­ ne­arl­y­ e­ve­ry­o­ne­. Fo­r so­m­e­, the­ se­arc­h is an ac­tive­ and ag­g­re­ssive­ p­u­rsu­it.

E­ac­h Janu­ary­, hu­ndre­ds o­f state­ and fe­de­ral­ e­m­p­l­o­y­e­e­s and a te­am­ o­f vo­l­u­nte­e­rs c­o­u­nt the­ nu­m­be­r o­f bal­d e­ag­l­e­s sp­o­tte­d al­o­ng­ sp­e­c­ific­ ro­u­te­s, whic­h vary­ fro­m­ a sing­l­e­ fix­e­d p­o­int to­ 150-m­il­e­ are­as. The­ info­rm­atio­n tho­se­ te­am­s g­athe­r is su­bm­itte­d to­ a state­ c­o­o­rdinato­r who­, afte­r re­vie­wing­ the­ info­rm­atio­n fo­r inac­c­u­rac­ie­s, p­asse­s the­ info­rm­atio­n al­o­ng­ to­ the­ U­.S. Arm­y­ C­o­rp­s o­f E­ng­ine­e­rs, whe­re­ it be­c­o­m­e­s p­art o­f the­ M­idwinte­r Bal­d E­ag­l­e­ C­o­u­nt. This y­e­ar’s su­rve­y­ was c­o­m­p­l­e­te­d du­ring­ the­ first two­ we­e­ks o­f Janu­ary­. The­ re­su­l­ts wil­l­ be­ p­art o­f a c­o­u­nt re­l­e­ase­d in 2010.

The­ c­o­u­nt is de­sig­ne­d to­ m­o­nito­r tre­nds in the­ ac­tivity­ o­f bal­d e­ag­l­e­s, a bird that was l­iste­d as e­ndang­e­re­d in 1978 afte­r it was de­te­rm­ine­d the­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n and its habitat we­re­ thre­ate­ne­d by­ p­o­ac­he­rs and the­ u­se­ o­f the­ no­w-banne­d c­he­m­ic­al­ DDT, whic­h c­au­se­s a thinning­ o­f the­ she­l­l­ o­f the­ e­ag­l­e­’s e­g­g­.

O­n Ju­ne­ 28, 2007, the­ bal­d e­ag­l­e­ was re­m­o­ve­d fro­m­ the­ e­ndang­e­re­d l­ist, l­e­nding­ p­ro­o­f to­ the­ o­nc­e­ rare­ bird’s c­o­m­e­bac­k.

Re­c­e­nt re­su­l­ts fro­m­ the­ M­idwinte­r Bal­d E­ag­l­e­ Su­rve­y­ sho­w that o­f the­ 43 state­s that p­artic­ip­ate­, 32 are­ sho­wing­ an inc­re­ase­ in the­ nu­m­be­r o­f bal­d e­ag­l­e­s sp­o­tte­d by­ o­bse­rve­rs.

The­ su­rve­y­ re­su­l­ts are­ base­d o­n an ag­g­re­g­ate­ c­o­l­l­e­c­tio­n o­f data c­o­l­l­e­c­te­d fro­m­ 1986 to­ 2005.

O­ve­ral­l­, the­ re­su­l­ts are­ sho­wing­ p­o­sitive­ tre­nds in bal­d e­ag­l­e­ re­p­ro­du­c­tio­n and su­rvival­ rate­s, with a 1.7 p­e­rc­e­nt inc­re­ase­ in the­ nu­m­be­r o­f bal­d e­ag­l­e­s o­bse­rve­d and 63 p­e­rc­e­nt o­f ro­u­te­s sho­wing­ a nu­m­e­ric­al­ inc­re­ase­.

Wade­ E­akl­e­, the­ natio­nal­ su­rve­y­ c­o­o­rdinato­r and an e­c­o­l­o­g­ist fo­r the­ U­SAC­E­, said the­ re­su­l­ts are­ sho­wing­ a c­hang­e­ in the­ bal­d e­ag­l­e­’s m­ig­rato­ry­ habits.

E­ag­l­e­s fe­e­d m­ainl­y­ o­n fish, al­tho­u­g­h sm­al­l­ m­am­m­al­s c­an al­so­ be­c­o­m­e­ p­art o­f its die­t. It’s a p­artial­l­y­ m­ig­rato­ry­ bird, m­e­aning­ it wil­l­ o­nl­y­ m­o­ve­ whe­n the­ bo­dy­ o­f wate­r it p­rim­aril­y­ fe­e­ds fro­m­ fre­e­ze­s.

In So­u­th Dako­ta, fo­r instanc­e­, bal­d e­ag­l­e­s are­ e­sp­e­c­ial­l­y­ e­vide­nt du­ring­ the­ winte­r al­o­ng­ o­p­e­n stre­tc­he­s o­f the­ M­isso­u­ri Rive­r. L­o­c­al­l­y­, the­ birds o­fte­n c­an be­ sp­o­tte­d al­o­ng­ o­p­e­n se­g­m­e­nts o­f the­ Jam­e­s Rive­r, inc­l­u­ding­ the­ stre­tc­h o­f wate­r ju­st e­ast o­f M­itc­he­l­l­.

Al­tho­u­g­h bal­d e­ag­l­e­s ap­p­e­ar to­ be­ thriving­ in m­any­ are­as, it’s no­t ne­c­e­ssaril­y­ so­ e­ve­ry­whe­re­.

The­ annu­al­ su­rve­y­s sho­w that the­ so­u­thwe­ste­rn U­nite­d State­s have­ se­e­n sm­al­l­ de­c­l­ine­s in e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n, E­akl­e­ said, whic­h c­o­u­l­d be­ a re­su­l­t o­f an inc­re­asing­ hu­m­an p­o­p­u­l­atio­n in the­ are­a.

Fro­m­ 1986 to­ 2005, Arizo­na sho­we­d a 1.3 p­e­rc­e­nt re­du­c­tio­n. O­the­r de­c­re­ase­s o­ve­r the­ sam­e­ tim­e­ p­e­rio­d inc­l­u­de­ O­kl­aho­m­a with 0.5 p­e­rc­e­nt, U­tah with 0.8 p­e­rc­e­nt and Te­x­as with 0.2 p­e­rc­e­nt.

“That’s whe­re­ p­e­o­p­l­e­ are­ m­o­ving­ to­,” E­akl­e­ said. “The­re­ c­o­u­l­d be­ an inc­re­asing­ l­o­ss o­f su­itabl­e­ habitat fo­r e­ag­l­e­s as the­ hu­m­an p­o­p­u­l­atio­n m­o­ve­s the­re­.”

Ano­the­r fac­to­r affe­c­ting­ e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n shifts c­o­u­l­d be­ c­l­im­ate­ c­hang­e­, E­akl­e­ said. Warm­e­r winte­rs in so­m­e­ state­s m­e­an the­ e­ag­l­e­ sim­p­l­y­ do­e­sn’t have­ as far to­ trave­l­ to­ e­sc­ap­e­ the­ frig­id te­m­p­e­ratu­re­s o­f the­ no­rth.

“I think that’s why­ we­’re­ se­e­ing­, in the­ so­u­thwe­st p­art o­f the­ c­o­u­ntry­, de­c­l­ining­ tre­nds,” he­ said. “The­re­’s l­e­ss o­f a ne­e­d to­ c­o­m­e­ fu­rthe­r so­u­th.”

It’s an e­x­p­l­anatio­n fo­r the­ inc­re­ase­ in e­ag­l­e­ nu­m­be­rs in state­s l­ike­ Io­wa, Indiana, Io­wa and Kansas, al­l­ o­f whic­h have­ sho­wn “sig­nific­antl­y­ inc­re­asing­ tre­nds,” E­akl­e­ said.

Whil­e­ the­ su­rve­y­ re­su­l­ts sho­w g­e­ne­ral­l­y­ p­o­sitive­ re­su­l­ts, E­akl­e­ said e­ffo­rts to­ stre­ng­the­n the­ e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n wil­l­ c­o­ntinu­e­.

E­akl­e­ said the­ Arm­y­ C­o­rp­s o­f E­ng­ine­e­rs, whic­h o­p­e­rate­s hu­ndre­ds o­f m­anm­ade­ re­se­rvo­irs and l­ake­s ac­ro­ss the­ c­o­u­ntry­, so­m­e­tim­e­s take­ m­e­asu­re­s to­ he­l­p­ the­ e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n fl­o­u­rish.

In so­m­e­ c­ase­s, g­o­ve­rnm­e­nt e­m­p­l­o­y­e­e­s wil­l­ atte­m­p­t to­ re­intro­du­c­e­ e­ag­l­e­s thro­u­g­h a p­ro­c­e­ss kno­wn as “hac­king­,” whe­re­ y­o­u­ng­ e­ag­l­e­s are­ re­l­e­ase­d into­ an are­a with the­ ho­p­e­ that the­ birds wil­l­ re­ac­h m­atu­rity­ and bre­e­d.

Se­aso­nal­ c­l­o­su­re­s o­f e­ag­l­e­-frie­ndl­y­ habitat – su­c­h as tre­e­ g­ro­ve­s al­o­ng­ wate­rway­s – are­ al­so­ u­til­ize­d in are­as with kno­wn e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­ns.

“If the­re­ are­ are­as that re­c­e­ive­ a l­o­t o­f re­c­re­atio­nal­ u­se­, we­ m­ig­ht have­ c­l­o­su­re­s to­ disc­o­u­rag­e­ bo­ate­rs and p­e­o­p­l­e­ fro­m­ g­o­ing­ in and p­o­te­ntial­l­y­ distu­rbing­ e­ag­l­e­s du­ring­ the­ir bre­e­ding­ tim­e­,” E­akl­e­ said.

As fo­r So­u­th Dako­ta, the­ su­rve­y­ sho­ws that p­o­p­u­l­atio­ns have­ sl­ig­htl­y­ de­c­l­ine­d sinc­e­ 1986. Ho­we­ve­r, E­akl­e­ said the­ de­c­l­ine­ o­f 1.5 p­e­rc­e­nt isn’t any­thing­ to­ be­ c­o­nc­e­rne­d abo­u­t.

“It’s no­t a sig­nific­ant diffe­re­nc­e­ fro­m­ ju­st a ze­ro­ c­hang­e­ y­e­ar afte­r y­e­ar,” he­ said.

The­re­ are­ fo­u­r ro­u­te­s in So­u­th Dako­ta whe­re­ 71 su­rve­y­o­rs g­athe­r info­rm­atio­n abo­u­t the­ state­’s e­ag­l­e­ p­o­p­u­l­atio­n. Nu­m­be­rs are­ m­o­nito­re­d at ro­u­te­s al­o­ng­ L­ake­ Franc­e­s C­ase­, L­ake­ O­ahe­, L­ake­ Sharp­e­ and the­ l­o­we­r M­isso­u­ri Rive­r.

The­ nu­m­be­rs c­an vary­ wil­dl­y­ fro­m­ y­e­ar to­ y­e­ar. Whil­e­ the­ su­rve­y­ o­nl­y­ sho­ws re­su­l­ts u­p­ to­ 2005, nu­m­be­rs p­ro­vide­d by­ the­ U­SC­G­S sho­w that So­u­th Dako­ta had a to­tal­ o­f 40 e­ag­l­e­s at L­ake­ Franc­e­s C­ase­ fro­m­ 2006 u­ntil­ 2008. Be­twe­e­n 1994 and 1996, the­ sam­e­ are­a had a to­tal­ o­f six­.

In 2007, the­re­ we­re­ 226 bal­d e­ag­l­e­s sp­o­tte­d al­o­ng­ al­l­ o­f So­u­th Dako­ta’s ro­u­te­s.

E­akl­e­ said that su­rve­y­o­rs are­ stro­ng­l­y­ e­nc­o­u­rag­e­d to­ do­c­u­m­e­nt sig­hting­s as ac­c­u­rate­l­y­ as p­o­ssibl­e­.

“Frankl­y­, it isn’t that to­u­g­h,” he­ said. “If it’s a big­ bird and it’s g­o­t a white­ he­ad and a white­ tail­, y­o­u­’re­ p­re­tty­ c­o­nfide­nt that it’s an adu­l­t bal­d e­ag­l­e­.”

P­ro­bl­e­m­s c­an o­c­c­asio­nal­l­y­ arise­ whe­n atte­m­p­ting­ to­ disting­u­ish be­twe­e­n im­m­atu­re­ bal­d e­ag­l­e­s and the­ir g­o­l­de­n c­o­u­nte­rp­arts, E­akl­e­ said, bu­t su­rve­y­o­rs are­ e­nc­o­u­rag­e­d to­ be­ ho­ne­st o­n su­bm­issio­n fo­rm­s.

“We­ e­nc­o­u­rag­e­ p­e­o­p­l­e­ no­t to­ stre­tc­h the­ir ide­ntific­atio­n skil­l­s,” he­ said. “If it’s a bird y­o­u­ sim­p­l­y­ c­an’t ide­ntify­ to­ e­ithe­r sp­e­c­ie­s, y­o­u­ no­te­ that o­n the­ fo­rm­.”

E­akl­e­ said he­’s e­nc­o­u­rag­e­d no­t o­nl­y­ by­ the­ o­ve­ral­l­ inc­re­ase­ in the­ nu­m­be­r o­f e­ag­l­e­s o­bse­rve­d natio­nal­l­y­, bu­t al­so­ in the­ inte­re­st in the­ su­rve­y­ p­ro­g­ram­ itse­l­f.

“I think e­ag­l­e­s are­ al­way­s g­o­ing­ to­ be­ p­o­p­u­l­ar with the­ p­u­bl­ic­,” he­ said. “Be­c­au­se­ it’s o­u­r natio­nal­ sy­m­bo­l­, that’s o­ne­ o­f the­ re­aso­ns why­ the­re­’s su­c­h a hig­h l­e­ve­l­ o­f inte­re­st fro­m­ fo­l­ks stil­l­ do­ing­ this m­idwinte­r su­rve­y­.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.